On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> wrote: > We do have shmat(2) and shmdt(2). Can't you just use > open(2)/unlink(2) instead of shm_open()/shm_unlink()?
Bah, ignore that.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Matthew Dempsky <[email protected]> wrote: > We do have shmat(2) and shmdt(2). Can't you just use > open(2)/unlink(2) instead of shm_open()/shm_unlink()?
Bah, ignore that.