On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 06:47:40PM -0500, Brad wrote:
> Ethernet vlan(4) interfaces have valid Ethernet link layer
> addresses but use a different interface type (IFT_L2VLAN vs
> IFT_ETHER). Treat IFT_L2VLAN interfaces like IFT_ETHER
> interfaces when handling link layer addresses.
>
> From FreeBSD
>
>
> Index: ipv6cp.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/src/usr.sbin/ppp/ppp/ipv6cp.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.10
> diff -u -p -r1.10 ipv6cp.c
> --- ipv6cp.c 7 Aug 2008 19:26:57 -0000 1.10
> +++ ipv6cp.c 6 Feb 2011 07:29:30 -0000
> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ SetInterfaceID(u_char *ifid, int userand
> switch(sdl->sdl_type) {
> case IFT_ETHER:
> case IFT_FDDI:
> + case IFT_L2VLAN:
> /* XXX need more cases? */
> break;
> default:
>
While theoretically correct it does not matter much becuase we do not have
any IFT_L2VLAN interfaces in OpenBSD and honestly I think we will never
have them either. IFT_L2VLAN should not have been defined in the first
place. If it acts like an IFT_ETHER it should be a IFT_ETHER :)
Anyway since there are other ppp code checking for this I think this is OK
as well.
--
:wq Claudio
