Hi Stuart

On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:03:21AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Luis, can you send the latest version of your diff please. There were
> at least two and I'm not sure which one people should be testing.
> Then I'll test it on AR5213A 5.9 phy 4.3 rf2112a 4.6, WOR0W which works
> ok with the existing driver.

For testing the patch on this AR5213A, I would recommend you to use the
first version I sent which you can find at:

http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=126438116226809&w=2

The reason for using this one is because it's the only one that makes
any difference.  All the other versions of this patch still work on
my card but made no big difference on the others.
 
> Other people: if you have ath(4) devices please mail the full dmesg.
> In the subject line include the line from 'dmesg|grep ath0:' and
> write the word 'works' or 'broken' at the start of the subject.
> 
> e.g.
> 
> Subject: works: ath0: AR5213A 5.9 phy 4.3 rf2112a 4.6, WOR0W
> Subject: broken: ath0: AR5424 14.2 phy 7.0 rf 0.0, WOR0W
> 
> For now I want these for the existing in-tree driver. Doesn't have
> to be current - 4.6 or newer would be ok.

I hope to be able to submit a new patch during the weekend but,
again, I can only guarantee it will work on my card.  Adam has
volunteered to test any new patches (and several others are also
available for testing) but this is a very slow process.  This is
what I call the _real_ remote debugging :-)

--
Luis

Reply via email to