* Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> [2010-04-19 14:53]: > On 2010/04/19 08:34, Simon Perreault wrote: > > On 2010-04-19 08:31, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > > >sometimes it is better and necessary to have interfaces named under one > > >standartized name like fether0... fetherN for example > > > > Why? And how can groups not accomplish that? > > There is one place I've found where groups aren't supported; > PF 'set skip on' has some special 'match the first letters of the > interface name' code rather than using interface groups.
that is a bug. > The only place I've remotely wished for names other than our standard > schema is when using vlans (e.g. freebsd-style bge0.1700 creating a vlan > with tag 1700 on bge0), but not really wanted it badly enough to do > anything about it... same here actually :) -- Henning Brauer, [email protected], [email protected] BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting
