2010/1/27 Mike Belopuhov <m...@crypt.org.ru>: > Frankly, having scheme in without any support for REPL in mg is not > that awesome. What makes elisp so handy is an ability to see what > happens in realtime while programming (the usual Lisp/REPL development > way).
It's not done yet. > Also, it makes more sense to have a R[456]RS-compliant version than > just any or "tiny". It claims to be almost all of R5RS. I don't happen to have a testsuite for the spec, nor do I care that much, but one of the reasons I picked it was because the language is defined. > P.S. > mg is buggy and its source code is awful. That's somebody else's problem. :)
