On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:08, Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> wrote:
> I am going to revisit this.
>
>> I do believe i386/amd64 RAMDISKs are destined to more or
>> less mainstream hardware and ISA CGA, MDA, EGA, HGA
>> stuff isn't there anymore.
>>
>> So on i386 RAMDISK (like amd64 one), I suggest to remove
>>
>> pcdisplay0 at isa?
>> wsdisplay*    at pcdisplay?
>
> This breaks machines that really do exist out there.
>
> 2200    44      88      2332    91c     GENERIC/pcdisplay.o
> 135     1064    0       1199    4af     GENERIC/pcdisplay_chars.o
> 907     0       0       907     38b     GENERIC/pcdisplay_subr.o
>
>> sys/arch/i386/conf/RAMDISK:
>>
>> pckbc0                at isa?                 # PC keyboard controller
>> pckbd*                at pckbc?               # PC keyboard
>> wskbd*                at pckbd? mux 1
>> vga0          at isa?
>> vga*          at pci?
>> pcdisplay0    at isa?                 # CGA, MDA, EGA, HGA
>> wsdisplay*    at vga?
>> wsdisplay*    at pcdisplay?
>
> This breaks 99% of i386 machines, ie. every machine that has either
> a pci vga display or a non-usb keyboard.
>
>> sys/arch/amd64/conf/RAMDISK:
>>
>> pckbc0                at isa?         # PC keyboard controller
>> pckbd*                at pckbc?       # PC keyboard
>> wskbd*                at pckbd? mux 1
>> vga0          at isa?
>> vga*          at pci?
>> wsdisplay*    at vga?
>
> This breaks 99% of amd64 machines, ie. every machine that has either
> a pci vga display or a non-usb keyboard.

Well, I'm a bit disappointed.

1.49 of sys/arch/amd64/conf/RAMDISK does not contain
pcdisplay0.

> In the last week alone, *two* people mailed in dmesg's that have isa
> vga adapters.  You are living in a fantasy if you think that
> restricting hardware support like that helps anyone.

I told about removing pcdisplay0 at isa?, not vga0 at isa?

Searching over bugs@ mail archives shows no fresh
dmesgs with pcdisplay0.

Alexey

Reply via email to