I usually tend to agree, though sh vs bash does occasionally make a
difference. But yeah, around that time I'm usually looking to refactor it
entirely.

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:29 PM, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote:

> On Thu, 12 May 2016, Jack Coats wrote:
>
> Several friends hated bash (Bourne Again Shell) so they used sh (Bourne
>> Shell - but it is superseded).  They started using korn shell and c-shell.
>> Both Korn and c-shell have good and bad points.  Korn is similar to bash
>> but is more capable (but bash is more capable that sh anyway).  C-shell
>> was
>> a choice of many K&R C programmers historically, but from what I can tell,
>> shell programming is falling out of favor for 'newer' languages in
>> general.
>>
>
>
> IMO, if the difference between the different shells starts to matter, you
> have probably crossed the line into something that really should be written
> in a different language :-)
>
> David Lang
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> Tech@lists.lopsa.org
> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
> http://lopsa.org/
>
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to