I usually tend to agree, though sh vs bash does occasionally make a difference. But yeah, around that time I'm usually looking to refactor it entirely.
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:29 PM, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2016, Jack Coats wrote: > > Several friends hated bash (Bourne Again Shell) so they used sh (Bourne >> Shell - but it is superseded). They started using korn shell and c-shell. >> Both Korn and c-shell have good and bad points. Korn is similar to bash >> but is more capable (but bash is more capable that sh anyway). C-shell >> was >> a choice of many K&R C programmers historically, but from what I can tell, >> shell programming is falling out of favor for 'newer' languages in >> general. >> > > > IMO, if the difference between the different shells starts to matter, you > have probably crossed the line into something that really should be written > in a different language :-) > > David Lang > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech@lists.lopsa.org > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ >
_______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lists.lopsa.org https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/