You could consider an appliance approach... on the cheap side:
http://www.bswusa.com/Site-Control-Broadcast-Tools-NTP-Server-Sentinel-P8700.aspx?gclid=Cj0KEQjwoYi4BRDF_PHHu6rI7NMBEiQAKZ-JuLzp0zvvbEe8pxNHVIExueJFtjUYir1BjggIv6B-rIEaAs_W8P8HAQ On te more expensive side: http://www.endruntechnologies.com/ https://www.meinbergglobal.com/ On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 04:18:35PM +0000, Jeremy Charles wrote: > I'm seeing all sort of documentation about how it's not a great idea to use a > VM as an NTP server due to how sketchy time tracking is within a VM. > > My supervisor directed me to try it anyway. He feels that our existing NTP > servers are too old and need to be replaced, and he wants to replace them > with VMs rather than physical servers. > > I'm not seeing any difference in behavior between the two existing physical > NTP servers and the VM that I set up to test as an NTP server. > > Thoughts? > > == > Jeremy Charles > Epic's Computer and Technology Services Division > jchar...@epic.com > 608-271-9000 > > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech@lists.lopsa.org > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lists.lopsa.org https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
