On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) <lop...@nedharvey.com> wrote: > Sure, they might have fed biased attacks into the system in order to produce > biased results. I don't know. So this is the point of the question. How do > you choose? Do you choose Barracuda basically out of tradition? What if > PhishingGuardian really *is* so much better? If we hypothetically assert > that PhishingGuardian is an upgrade over Barracuda, is there any way to test > that assertion? Will anyone notice or care about an upgrade? Would they > conversely notice or care if they were forced to downgrade back?
If both are the same, or are incomparable, why not pick the one that is easiest to administer? Just a thought. Tom -- Email: t...@whatexit.org Work: tlimonce...@stackoverflow.com Skype: YesThatTom Blog: http://EverythingSysadmin.com _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lists.lopsa.org https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
