While I don't use it solely, I do have ~70TB being backed up using
Crashplan ProE over a geographically dispersed area. Code42 has definitely
made some significant progress over the past 18 months. No chuckles here.


On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Iain Morris <iain.t.mor...@gmail.com>wrote:

> This may get some chuckles, but I've had decent luck using Crashplan's
> free client to back up some small offices with diverse systems to a linux
> server.  You don't get snapshots over time, but if all you need is an
> additional copy for backup, it's quite flexible and open to expansion
> offsite for free, or with their seeding service to their datacenter.  In
> the past I've thought it was too "simple" for a business server environment
> (is that bad? :-) ), but it's always in the back of my mind as an option.
>
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Paul Heinlein <heinl...@madboa.com>wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 12 May 2013, Skylar Thompson wrote:
>>
>>  On 05/12/2013 10:26 AM, Michael Tiernan wrote:
>>>
>>>>  On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Skylar Thompson
>>>>  <skylar.thomp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >  How do you define reliability?
>>>>
>>>
>>   I think that that's a darned good question. Skylar's pair of
>>>>  points misses a key definition. As a guy from Keane that I used to
>>>>  work with said, no one cares about backups, they only care about
>>>>  restores.
>>>>
>>>
>> From the customer's perspective -- which for me is the only perspective
>> that really counts -- restoration *is* the service; backup is just the tool
>> that facilitates it.
>>
>> I've only had to do about one restoration per year over the eight years
>> I've been at $WORK (small engineering-heavy company).
>>
>> Bacula (+ LTO) has never failed me during that time. I won't claim that
>> it's any better than the other tools mention in the OP's list; my point is
>> that I've found Bacula to be reliable. (I do agree with the person who
>> lamented Bacula's oft-confusing interface and documentation.)
>>
>> If Bacula's catalog is hosted on traditional hard disks, it can take
>> several minutes to build the dump-like interface to the filesystem to be
>> restored. I still spool to HDs, but I've moved MySQL to SSDs, and it's much
>> much much speedier now.
>>
>> I've deployed rdiff-backup at home, and on a much smaller scale, but I've
>> never done anything but test restores with it.
>>
>> --
>> Paul Heinlein
>> heinl...@madboa.com
>> 45°38' N, 122°6' W
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tech mailing list
>> Tech@lists.lopsa.org
>> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
>> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>>  http://lopsa.org/
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -- -
> Iain Morris
> iain.t.mor...@gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> Tech@lists.lopsa.org
> https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
> This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
>  http://lopsa.org/
>
>


-- 
Derek Monaghan
derek.monag...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
Tech@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
 http://lopsa.org/

Reply via email to