i always said "per-rack switch", not "top-of-rack". On May 8, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Matt Lawrence wrote:
> I am seeing a bit of a trend away from Top Of Rack switches to middle of rack > switches (although TOR is a much better acronym). I think it may be a better > way to go than what I have currenty set up as I build new racks. Not only do > I think the reduced cable density would be a huge improvement, I also have a > problem with lack of choices in cable length for some of the cables I am > using. > > The downsides? It's a change from tradition and I'm not sure about managing > the excess cable from connections going up the rack. > > What do y'all think? > > -- Matt > It's not what I know that counts. > It's what I can remember in time to use. > _______________________________________________ > Tech mailing list > Tech@lists.lopsa.org > https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech > This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators > http://lopsa.org/ ----------------------- Andrew Hume 623-551-2845 (VO and best) 973-236-2014 (NJ) and...@research.att.com
_______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lists.lopsa.org https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
