-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 5/6/11 04:07 , Aleksandar Ivanisevic wrote: > bad as hard coding a password. It is actually worse since a private key > will usually give you a full shell while rsync will give you only > (limited) data access.
Anyone who does that is doing it wrong... I've done stuff like this; the authorized_keys file specifies that the key can only do specific things (see "scponly" and similar packages). - -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allber...@gmail.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] kf8nh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3E0KEACgkQIn7hlCsL25UFbACgr7jK8ADidr/tQzcV0FzDnJKe D2IAnRMnf357bxp6+/vbjwMO0MGhlcuW =I3vX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list Tech@lists.lopsa.org https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
