>> In any case, the major issue I would have with it is the lack of >> authentication. But that's so obvious that I assume you would be >> doing something like requiring a password - or doing it only for >> AF_LOCAL sockets and using LOCAL_PEEREID. [...] > When this was done in last years GSoC it was a AF_LOCAL socket to > control inetd. I am not sure that inetd having a configuration > service listening on the network is a really good idea -
I'm not sure either. But I definitely am not sure enough that it never could be that I would specifically forbid a configuration that, for example, tries to activate cmdif on 10.4.77.186 or some such. /~\ The ASCII Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
