On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 08:45:33AM -0400, Mouse wrote: > > I'd argue that providing alloca(3) as anything except a compiler > > builtin is a bug, and that kind of thing should never be used. > > I'd argue that alloca should never be used and actually should never > have existed. As far as I can see it does nothing that can't be done > better - more portably and correctly - by variable-sized arrays. Am I > missing something?
I look forward to you fixing every piece of third-party code using it in the wild. :)
