On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 10:20:53AM +0900, PHO wrote:
> +/* The documentation for FUSE is not clear as to what "struct
> + * fuse_session" is, why it exists, or how it's different from "struct
> + * fuse". For now we define it as an empty struct and treat "struct
> + * fuse_session *" as being identical to "struct fuse *". */
> +struct fuse_session {};Specific remark here: try to avoid empty structures. They can create a real hassle when interacting between C and C++ as that's explicitly invalid for the latter. Joerg
