> On Oct 26, 2021, at 8:27 AM, Valery Ushakov <u...@stderr.spb.ru> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure why we left the sigcontext version in the tree. I would
> guess for reference only, so it doesn't really need any fixing, as far
> as I understand.
Presumably it was to keep old binaries that used the sigcontext style would
keep working. If it was for reference only, one would think it would have been
commented as such and the binary objects not actually built.
The commit that broke it had the log message “make these consistent”, which
doesn’t really convey to me that it was intended to disable them.
-- thorpej
