On Sun, Oct 03, 2021 at 06:30:36PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 07:54:18PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > > > So, if it happens that way, then it really does not matter from the > > > NetBSD side if pkgsrc moves to 3 this branch, or adds 3 as an option > > > alongside 1.1.1, or doesn't do either. But, as you switch things, it > > > will be good for pkgsrc to be able to use the native 3 and have other > > > packages build against it. > > > > Yes and no; what are the odds that if both are installed (because > > something in pkgsrc wants 3 and base doesn't have it yet) that > > everything will actually work? bl3 will help with this, but only so > > much... > > I see your point, but this is exactly what was happening earlier on I > think 8 (maybe 7) that had openssl 1.0.x when pkgsrc had 1.1. It mostly > worked.
True. That didn't become mandatory for some time, but I guess the same will probably be true this go. (I thought of another issue, but it belongs in the pkgsrc thread) -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
