If we make Kamil's suggested ", ...) __printflike" change, then upstream will not have to #ifdef __NetBSD__ the calls.
christos > On Aug 9, 2019, at 9:11 PM, Martin Husemann <mar...@duskware.de> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 07:09:01PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >> Delayed adoption of a standardized version of pthread_setname() >> pthread_getname() will result in no API & ABI breakage with any existing >> code as we will keep our own _np() invention, at least until we will >> bump major number for libpthread. and drop redundant _np() variation > > This is a good argument. And we may even opt to not drop the _np variant at > all. > > However, if we go for this - why change anything at all right now? > > Keeping everything unchanged, pushing for a posix version, and then adopt > that as soon as the signature is fixed sounds like a good plan to me. > > If we touch it, we should do it cleanly. > > Martin
