any reason you're using `int` rather than `pthread_key_t` for `tss_t`? (given that the other C11 types are just the pthread types.) for Android, i'm going with all the types being the same, and wondered if i missed something here?
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 6:30 PM Kamil Rytarowski <n...@gmx.com> wrote: > > I wrote a complete C11 threading support for NetBSD. > > The original implementation was written in 2016 and interrupted due to > some issues in libpthread(3). These bugs are now gone. > > In the context of final implementation of C11 threads in GLIBC and the > process of making it a part of POSIX, I've picked this work, cleaned up > and added ATF tests. > > As noted by Joerg, an alternative way to implement C11 threads is to put > it in libpthread(3) (instead of libc). This is a good idea as we can > stop relying on libc stubs and stop adding more stubs that are still > missing in libc. > > The patch includes man pages. > > http://netbsd.org/~kamil/patch-00104-c11threads-in-pthread.3.txt > > I intend to get it merged before the -9 branch. > > I'm open for comments. >
