Date:        Wed, 17 Apr 2019 19:02:47 +0200
    From:        Kamil Rytarowski <n...@gmx.com>
    Message-ID:  <dad3e910-e22f-851d-3101-0753b5b0d...@gmx.com>

Thanks, and

  | +typedef pthread_t    thrd_t;

is a very clear answer to the question...   Unless anyone
has any objections to that method, I think we can ignore the
(possible) posix requirement as being any kind of issue for us.

kre

Reply via email to