In article <CAJgzZooum5=3vczkaohy2+tijj6eptkhtqc-9wyq47cnvzm...@mail.gmail.com>, enh <e...@google.com> wrote: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >here's a patch that doesn't actually break anything. the previous >version was wrong in the non-copy case, so this version always copies. >(the alternative would be to remember the overwritten byte and restore >it on the next call, but this brings the code closer to getdelim(3).)
Applied, thanks! christos
