In article <l03102802d88ca02ad...@q840.causeuse.org>, Hauke Fath <ha...@espresso.rhein-neckar.de> wrote: >At 11:46 Uhr -0500 15.02.2019, Christos Zoulas wrote: >>| Please read it again - that is not what Rin said. In fact, he gave >>| technical reasons. >> >>I am not happy with the interaction, not the decision. > >That's fine. I can understand that. > >>| As did I - "relegate fluff to pkgsrc". ;) >> >>Is coloring the output fluff? Would you feel the same way if someone >>added syntax highlighting to vi(1)? Would you find autoconfig errors >>in the kernel easier if they were red? Is file completion and command >>line editing fluff? > >Yes, yes, no (they fly by too fast, anyway), no (then again, sh(1) and >csh(1) don't do that out of the box). > >That's why I have to install XEmacs, tcsh and uucp from pkgsrc. Which is fine.
So the question then becomes: "Is something that you presumably need, since you use everyday 'fluff'?" Perhaps not 'need', but something that you prefer to use all the time. christos
