On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:50:30PM +0000, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> telnet:
> 1. terrible code, with many abstraction violations
> 2. something people expect to talk to their legacy machines, which
> nobody but them has access to.
> 3. common use case is served by netcat, already in base.
> 4. too much superfluous functionality.
>
> Let's pull it out as a package, the alternative being breaking
> functionality for the four remaining users.
Actually, lots of mananged network equipements (or remote management boards)
can talk telnet. It still has its use.
--
Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--
