> or are we restricted by some standard from having dirname(3)
> be able to be called on the results of a previous dirname(3) call
Not exactly restricted from, but
        This is not strictly a bug; it is explicitly allowed by 
        IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 (``POSIX.1'').

> in which case we should document this in the manpage?
        The dirname() function returns a pointer to static storage 
        that may be overwritten by subsequent calls to dirname().

Reply via email to