On 08.06.2016 09:09, Martin Husemann wrote: > Maybe a minor nit: > > case _SC_THREAD_STACK_MIN: > - return _getpagesize(); > + return PTHREAD_STACK_MIN; > > > I would make that the max() of the two values, and also do the same for > the EINVAL test in libpthread. Machines with > 8k pages do exist. > > Also I am still not convinced we should have this symbol, as my reading > of the standard is that our current state is perfectly fine. > > However, MINSIGSTKSZ is wrong on those machines too, so maybe ignore for > now (or mark with XXX comments)? > > Martin >
The point is to abstract this work to determine minimal stack size from 3rd party software. Is defining it as per-port value correct?
