вс, 11 мая 2025 г., 18:03 Paul Goyette <p...@whooppee.com>:

> You're asking for a lot, and I am not prepared to spend the time it
> would require.  I have already updated x86/boot(8) and added a Xr
> for mk.conf(5), and if someone wants to write a wiki page I will
> happily review/edit it.  wiz@ has already created a wiki page (see
> https://wiki.netbsd.org/kernel_dir/) that may address some of your
> concerns.
>

>From this page it looks like kern + modules dir will lost modules
arch/version information previously plainly visible in path?




> I've also done my best here in this thread (and elsewhere) to make it
> as clear as I can that this relates to KERNEL_DIR, and that is only
> pertains to i386 and amd64.  The option is entirely optional, but the
> bootloader needs to cope with both "set" and "unset" environments, to
> avoid a proliferation of boot images.
>
> Most of the impact of KERNEL_DIR is already committed; this newest
> proposal is minor and has minimal impact.
>
>
>
> On Sun, 11 May 2025, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
>
> >> Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 06:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
> >> From: Paul Goyette <p...@whooppee.com>
> >>
> >> On Sun, 11 May 2025, Greg Troxel wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thus I suspect I am missing something.
> >>
> >> Yup, I think you're missing the fact that all of this relates to the
> >> ratther new-ish KERNEL_DIR option, support for which was only recently
> >> completed (by myself).  KERNEL_DIR is described briefly in options(4),
> >> and it is noted in both CHANGES and UPDATING.
> >>
> >> In short, KERNEL_DIR provides a mechanism to keep a kernel and its
> >> associated modules together, addressing one of the most common
> >> complaints about modules.
> >>
> >> Sorry for not making this more clear.
> >
> > I think it is important to
> >
> > (a) make this clear and obvious and intuitive, _and_
> > (b) make sure we have tested any plausible transition paths that might
> > happen.
> >
> > To that end, this present proposal aside (I haven't digested it, no
> > comments about it), I would strongly suggest that you make a wiki page
> > describing everything about the KERNEL_DIR changes (not just the terse
> > summary in CHANGES, or the notes in UPDATING which are only for an
> > audience of current users to maintain MKUPDATE=yes builds), including
> > a systematic table of:
> >
> > 1. What has changed or will change in the standard bootloader?
> > 2. What has changed or will change in a custom bootloader with any new
> >   build options?
> > 3. What has changed or will change in an unmodified GENERIC kernel?
> > 4. What has changed or will change in a custom kernel with any new
> >   build options?
> > 5. What does/will sysinst do?
> > 6. How are transitions/upgrades expected to happen?  What will happen
> >   when a stock netbsd-10 installation is updated to a stock netbsd-11
> >   installation?
> > 7. How have all of these scenarios been tested?
> >
> > We really need to make sure this doesn't become another /var/db/pkg
> > renaming debacle that leaves everyone's machines in confusing
> > inconsistent states requiring manual intervention.
> >
> > This type of change -- substantially altering the semantics of how the
> > bootloader finds the kernel -- has an extremely high risk, not just of
> > putting machines into confusing states, but of rendering them
> > unbootable when you update the bootloader.  And, if we were doing it
> > again, I would ask that any changes be proposed to tech-kern and
> > port-*, with all this relevant information, _before_ committing
> > anything that affects default builds.
> >
> > (It's likely that there already are good answers to all of these
> > questions, and you've already figured all this out -- it's just not
> > clear to me from the CHANGES and UPDATING notes and the scattering of
> > commit messages I've seen fly by, so I'm just asking for a clear
> > picture to be presented in an obvious place to see how this will
> > affect users.)
> >
> > !DSPAM:6820b69e284681540015745!
> >
> >
>
> +---------------------+--------------------------+----------------------+
> | Paul Goyette (.sig) | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:    |
> | (Retired)           | 1B11 1849 721C 56C8 F63A | p...@whooppee.com    |
> | Software Developer  | 6E2E 05FD 15CE 9F2D 5102 | pgoye...@netbsd.org  |
> | & Network Engineer  |                          | pgoyett...@gmail.com |
> +---------------------+--------------------------+----------------------+
>

Reply via email to