So then I guess we will need to init rv to 0. So if the interrupt doesn’t go through the true branches, we certainly know that it’s not for us.
> On 25 Mar 2025, at 1:53 PM, Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 01:31:46PM +0000, Emmanuel Nyarko wrote: >> >> https://github.com/Emmankoko/altq_refactoring_gsoc/commit/918c9c8056ccc2ed7da214bbf3c8c3cd4071fa8c? >> returning garbage value · Emmankoko/altq_refactoring_gsoc@918c9c8 >> github.com >> >> I don?t really understand the need of the return value in this case. But >> would appreciate some global reviews here. >> >> Is a return 0 or 1 relevant to the logic here. It looks like some interrupt >> handling. > > it is interrupt handling; return 0 if the iterrupt was not for us, 1 if it > was. > >> >> Is it supposed to always return 1? > > No, if we know the interrupt was not for us return 0. > > -- > Manuel Bouyer <bou...@antioche.eu.org> > NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference > -- Emmanuel
