On Sat, Oct 01, 2022 at 07:59:23PM -0400, Mouse wrote: > > usual approach to such things. Your suggestion of pushing it into a > separate function (which presumably would just mean using return > instead of break to terminate the code block) strikes me as worth > considering in general but a bad idea in this case; there are too many > things that would have to be passed down to the function in question.
Of course, GCC offers nested functions for exactly this, but... Thor
