> On Aug 1, 2021, at 11:10 AM, Martin Husemann <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 07:57:20AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>> The situation hasn't changed. I'm still waiting for concrete proposals.
>
> The concrete proposal is backout - if there is no better idea how to deal
> with it properly.
I have reworked it on the thorpej-cfargs2 branch. It addresses the concerns
about compile-time type checking by using an anonymous structure constructed
in-line with the help of a variadic preprocessor macro (to save wear and tear
on your fingers and keyboard that might otherwise occur because of annoying
boilerplate syntax to construct the structure in-line).
Old example:
c->c_dev = config_found(sc->sc_dev, &pa, pciprint,
CFARG_SUBMATCH, config_stdsubmatch,
CFARG_LOCATORS, locs,
CFARG_DEVHANDLE, devhandle,
CFARG_EOL);
New example:
c->c_dev = config_found(sc->sc_dev, &pa, pciprint,
CFARGS(.submatch = config_stdsubmatch,
.locators = locs,
.devhandle = devhandle));
Acceptable?
-- thorpej
