Erik Fair <f...@netbsd.org> wrote: > > I think it’d be better to call this a co-processor API (or something else > along these lines less specific than “FPU”), and type the co-processor > and its required, additional context for generality - just to look ahead > a little bit. >
FYI: https://man.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/man-cgi?pcu++NetBSD-current -- Mindaugas