On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 06:34:11AM +0300, Jason Thorpe wrote: > > The implementation I posted requires O_EXEC because this is the only way > > to set FEXEC which is part of the check_exec() tests. Of course we can > > elide this test and not require it in the fd case. It just seems nicely > > symmetric to me the way it is now. > > It may be "nicely symmetrical", but it's not a correct > implementation. O_RDONLY (without O_EXEC) is explicitly allowed.
...by a POSIX_MISTAKE :-) -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
