On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 12:16:41PM -0500, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > I think LFS may still have a local workaround for this. Perhaps it > should be generalized.
LFS nowadays keeps atimes in the ifile, which cuts significantly down on the write traffic they generate, but doesn't translate readily to any other fs. A new fs might well want to use a separate chunk of blocks as an atime map; but that would create a huge write hotspot too so isn't necessarily a good plan. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
