BTW, why do you use
return (0);
in some of the drivers, while others use
return 0;
?
Shouldn't we standardise on one or the other?
Sorry, just nit-picking - the actual changes look pretty much ok to me.
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, Jason Thorpe wrote:
I???ve gone through all of the i2c drivers I can find in the source
tree and audited their auto configuration scheme. Each of the drivers
has been updated to return the "match quality" values introduced in
the previous set of changes. To review, those "match quality" values
are:
<snip>
+------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot com |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd dot org |
+------------------+--------------------------+----------------------------+
