On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:05:07AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > I would suggest that the only "proper" use of mbuf tags as currently > implemented is experimentation. Uses of the tags which have been in > the tree for a decade or more should be subsumed into the mbuf > datastructure itself, with some care taken to not make it too large, > or perhaps a single, "standard" extension structure could be defined > to capture the less-common cases.
That's essentially what I said much earlier, except with packet header instead of just mbuf. Joerg
