In article <[email protected]>, David Holland <[email protected]> wrote: >On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 06:30:08PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote: > > most of the FSs under sys/fs have their headers in /usr/include/fs/FS-NAME/. > > Some are just in /usr/include/FS-NAME/: msdosfs - adosfs - filecorefs - > > ntfs. > > > > Is it intentional? It's ok if I move them in fs/? > >I would leave it alone - some of these may be used by third-party >code, and it isn't clear which. If we're going to rearrange it, we >should rearrange *all* the fs headers (e.g. ffs, nfs) at the same >time, and we aren't ready to do that. > >(because... it requires a real version control system... *rimshot*)
Yes, too big of a pain for very little gain... I would leave it alone. Note that when we moved some filesystems from the top level into fs, we did not move the includes just to avoid that pain. christos
