Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-k...@mumble.net> wrote: > I know this is a bike shed, and I'm sorry to be the one to bring it > up, but can we use the names chmodat, chownat, &c., for our native > system calls, and just use libc aliases or _BLAH_SOURCE nonsense or > something for the ridiculous `f' prefix on fchmodat, fchownat, &c.?
What is the goal? You want to write userland code using chmodat() instead of fchmodat()? -- Emmanuel Dreyfus http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz m...@netbsd.org
