On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:34:08AM +0100, Edgar Fu? wrote: > > wapbl_register_inode shouldn't be able to reach that panic... > Maybe that's some stack frame optimization.
Well... as far as I can tell wapbl_register_inode does not call wapbl_register_deallocation, so it shouldn't be. But maybe ddb is lying; wouldn't be the first time. > > it's in wapbl_register_deallocation. > Yes, as it says: wapbl_register_deallocation: out of resources > > > ffs_truncate calls both, but mkdir shouldn't result in things being > > released... or so I'd think. > > But the panics occured during a bunch of mkdirs and ddb says the > active process is mkdir! Right, I'm not saying it didn't happen, it just doesn't make sense. -- David A. Holland dholl...@netbsd.org
