On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 07:45:11AM +0000, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > do you mean to implement fuse_getgroups for NetBSD with the sysctl? > if you are adding a #ifdef NetBSD block to the fuse, can't it use > a NetBSD-specific sidechannel to get the info from an appropriate > puffs-supplied uucred?
FUSE filesystems are not PUFFS servers, they do not have access to PUFFS-supplied uucred. perfused is the PUFFS server. It has the data, but in order to pass it to the FUSE filesystem, the FUSE protocol neds to be extended. As I explained in another post, I have not been able to get consensus from FUSE maintainers on this extension. Therefore I have to fallback to asynchronous fecth of secondary groups through a system call. -- Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org
