On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 04:36:55AM -0500, Matthew Mondor wrote: > On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 09:33:54 +0100 > Nicolas Joly <nj...@pasteur.fr> wrote: > > > According to the online OpenGroup specification for read(2) available > > at [1], read(2) on directories is implementation dependant. If > > unsupported, it shall fail with EISDIR. > > In the case of sys/rump/librump/rumpvfs/rumpfs.c, is it possible that > the underlaying implementation could previously decide if it could > support read(2) on directories, and this would no longer be the case > with this patch?
No. This only impact the rump fs itself (used as the root file system in applications); its does not matter while accessing other fs through rump. -- Nicolas Joly Projects and Developments in Bioinformatics Institut Pasteur, Paris.
