[email protected] ("Greg A. Woods") writes:
>I tried using hardclock_ticks in sys/syscall_stats.h, but even with
>HZ=1000, the resolution was too fine compared to the time taken by the
>some system calls, and even the average time slice for user mode.
>It is _way_ better than statclock ticks though, and "almost" free.
Isn't statclock there to have measurements that are _not_ synchronized
with hardclock?
--
--
Michael van Elst
Internet: [email protected]
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
