On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 02:36:37PM +0200, Lars Heidieker wrote: > On 04/03/11 01:36, Matthew Mondor wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 11:49:14 +0200 > > Martin Husemann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 11:30:16AM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > >>> AFAIK dtrace doesn't work on non-modular kernels ... > >> Nor on most of our archs, and AFAICT there is not even a document > >> describing the (maybe nontrivial amount of) work needed to make it > >> work there. > > I don't think that we should leave the tracking for a hypothetical > > future; it'd be better if the interface, or implementation, allowed to > > do such tracking.... > > Just an Idea, how about giving the kmem allocator a pool like logging...
or malloc(9)-like :) -- Manuel Bouyer <[email protected]> NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference --
