Andrew Doran <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > You mean l->l_private should be copied on fork? Absolutely. > > For native fork I agree, but that's probably not the right thing to do if > FORK_SHARESIGS or whatever it's called (i.e. clone()ing off a Linux-style > thread). > > (Some day I hope we can emulate clone with _lwp_create() and undo a lot of > the complication to the process data structures.)
Chuck already did that for COMPAT_LINUX. :) Do you mean something else? -- Mindaugas
