On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 04:04:59PM -0400, Matthew Mondor wrote: > On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:58:19 -0400 > Thor Lancelot Simon <t...@panix.com> wrote: > > > 2) Finish the asymmetric operation support in cryptodev and > > actually require modules to be signed. This is basically a > > superset of #1 above that could get about as complicated as > > one wanted it to (ugh) but might be worthwhile if kept simple. > > You seem to now agree with me that this could be a solution. It > indeed requires more work, but it also has advantages: not having to
Let me know when you've got the code ready for review. Thor
