On Jul 16, 2010, at 7:52 25PM, David Young wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 04:43:02PM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
>> Is there any reason anyone can think of to not add a NULL power
>> handler to the ipmi(4) driver? I can't see any reason for anything
>> special to happen either at suspend or resume, and the lack of a
>> power handler prevents the system from going to sleep at all.
>
> ipmi(4) should probably not suspend if its watchdog timer is active.
Watchdog timers and suspend pose an interesting philosophical problem: should
they be running when the system is suspended? I suspect not -- but what if the
system suspends when it shouldn't?
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
