On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 09:57:15AM -0800, john heasley wrote:
> 
> good point; i didn't think of the two (nor device) differently.  but, why
> should they be different?  SuSv3 doesn't mention socket either.  Its just
> a file descriptor though; shouldn't it be consistent?

So is a terminal.  Yet non-blocking I/O behavior varies wildly between
terminals and everything else...

-- 
Thor Lancelot Simon                                    t...@rek.tjls.com
  "All of my opinions are consistent, but I cannot present them all
   at once."    -Jean-Jacques Rousseau, On The Social Contract

Reply via email to