We can use Tapestry 4. It looks like I need to take a look at the specifics of applying these services. Thanks.
Matt -----Original Message----- From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 3:14 PM To: 'Tapestry users' Subject: RE: tapestry for a webwork developer Matt, Are you guys stuck with Tap3? If you're using Tap4, then you can use HiveMind services as the "guts" of your pages/components. Then, you can apply interceptors to those services much like you're describing. James -----Original Message----- From: Payne, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 3:11 PM To: tapestry-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: tapestry for a webwork developer I recently started with a new company that appears to have chosen tapestry as their framework. I've previously been swimming webwork over the last couple of years. I have to admit I have somewhat bias. I am digging around for a few good sample apps that use reasonably decent practices with Tapestry 4. I took a look at "Better Petshop" (uses tapestry 3). Is there anything "Better"? At first glance I was a little concerned with how verbose things were. For instance, the "actions" duplicate all the getters/setters that were in the main pojo they are exposing. e.g. instead of exposing get/set Customer, it had to copy all the properties to its action properties i.e. setGivenName(customer.getFirstname()); setFamilyName(customer.getLastname()); setAddress1(customer.getAddr1()); setAddress2(customer.getAddr2()); setCity(customer.getCity()); setStateOrProvince(customer.getState()); setCountry(customer.getCountry()); setPostalCode(customer.getZip()); setTelephoneNumber(customer.getPhone()); Is this typical with Tapestry apps? Can't we just expose the main pojo without all this extra code? The other thing I was concerned about is that much of the application's behavior is achieve via inheritance(e.g. the archaic struts way). OrderBillingPage-->ProtectedPage-->PetshopBasePage In webwork, I'd probably achieve the same behavior by adding a some type of securityInterceptor to that actions config(the are ways to default this to whole packages of actions). <action name="orderBilling" class="com.something.OrderBillingAction"> <interceptor-ref name="defaultStack"/> <interceptor-ref name="security"/> <!--- checks for user login and redirects to global result "LOGON" if needed --> <result name="success">billing.jsp</result> </action> Does tapestry have equivalent interceptors that can be defaulted for sections of the application without having to resort to inheritance? Thanks, Matt This message, including any attachments, is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy or delete the original message. Also, please be aware that if you are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or any action or reliance based on this message is prohibited by law. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message, including any attachments, is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy or delete the original message. Also, please be aware that if you are not the intended recipient, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or any action or reliance based on this message is prohibited by law. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
