On 4/7/06, Brian K. Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Personal opinion on this type of issue - hit us over the head! For a > bug-fix release, contractual interfaces shouldn't break - nor should > implementation details. For feature releases (.X and X.) there should at > least be notable mention and migration path, but those are where these > types of changes should appear - not bug fix releases. > > I do feel that these two releases were vitally important due to the > length of time since the last releases as well as the number of fixes. > No excuse tho' - I'm personally +1 to a 4.0.2 to fix this (and, possibly > non-intrusive fixes such as those pesky validation strings ;-)) > > That said - I'd also bow to Jesse on the final decision as it's in the > 4.X realm (and I don't have access to actually perform the release yet). > > Brian
Yes, Brian is totally correct. -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
