4.0, 1.1. Was the memory leak in relation to this? The only major fix I was aware of for 1.1.1 was the performance issue for threaded services.
-Mike On 3/21/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What version of Tapestry are you using? If it's 4.0, what version of > HiveMind are you using? There was a known memory leak in 1.1 which was > fixed in 1.1.1. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Snare [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 1:30 PM > To: Tapestry users > Subject: Memory leak? > > I'm pretty sure there's a memory leak in tapestry because the memory > usage climbs and climbs when caching is disabled. > > I understand that in a production environment you probably wouldn't > want caching disabled, but it seems tapestry should throw out whatever > it's creating if it's not going to use them. I don't think this is > happening. > > -Mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
