Don't feel bad. Anytime ANYONE posts performance benchmarks/comparisons, many people will critique it. You just have to be darn sure that your analysis is sound before you post (I'm not saying that it's not).
> Thanks for comments and pointing out potential issues. > I am not an expert in Tapestry nor JSF and I did this benchmark because > I wanted to chose one of them, thus I could've made very obvious > mistakes. > Looks like I need to rerun the Tap4 test with Hivemind 1.1.1. > I hope this will improve Tap4 results. > > > On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:33:04 -0600 > Robert Zeigler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Interesting. >> Some thoughts and/or questions: >> 1) Why are the page classes for success and fail abstract? They can be >> concrete. >> 2) For testing 4.0 stuff, why not use the 4.0 dtd? >> 3) You've implemented the home page name,password, etc. properties as >> simple properties... that is, you're not allowing tapestry to do the >> legwork for you. a) I hope you're not doing this in production b/c >> you'll run into issues in terms of data leaks. b) for benchmarking, >> too, you should do things the "tapestry way" since otherwise, the >> times don't reflect "real" processing times. >> 4) The simple example is nice for a variety of reasons, but where you >> will (theoretically, at least :) see tapestry shine over JSF is with >> complex component-tree rendering/handling. Why not create a very >> complex form with multiple nested components, etc. and compare jsf to >> tapestry? That's more "true to life" and illustrates performance in >> more realistic situations. >> >> Robert >> >> Alexander Varakin wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I ran a simple Tapestry vs JSF benchmark, results are posted on my >> > blog: >> > http://www.resupedia.com/blojsom/blog/Java/2006/02/28/Tapestry-vs-JSF.html >> > >> > >> > Alex >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > James Carman, President Carman Consulting, Inc. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
