A JIRA issue would be nice. I think a 4.0.1 release in the next week or two
is very probable. There is/has been a lot of bug fixing going on so it would
make sense.

I can't promise when this particular issue will make it out though. To get
into the framework in a non-hacky way it will require a lot of careful
thought.

On 3/10/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2/24/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/24/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > From what I've seen I'm guessing that the fix had to do with the
> > > applicationId.application notion more than the abililty to name the
> file
> > > whatever you want. It does provide a global message catalog, just not
> the
> > > ability to name the associated properties file whatever you like.
> > >
> > > I will double check again to be sure it's not really possible to name
> the
> > > file whatever you want.
> > >
> > > If it isn't possible ~currently~, will a fix in 4.0.1 be a useless
> effort
> > > for your purposes?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Should I enter an issue for this in JIRA?  I know it's tough to
> predict, but do you have a rough estimate of when 4.0.1 will be
> released?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >  On 2/24/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 2/24/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I am probably wrong, but without spending too much time on it (and
> more
> > > > > buying time until Howard can come in and correct me) I believe
> that you
> > > more
> > > > > or less ~have~ to have your global il10n properties file match
> your
> > > > > application specification file name. (Like pages and components
> do) .
> > > > >
> > > > > There is a property you can configure (in your web.xml servlet
> init
> > > param )
> > > > >
> > > > > "org.apache.tapestry.application-specification"
> > > > >
> > > > > Which is a string path to locate your .application file. So, if
> you had
> > > an
> > > > > application file named " petstoredemo.application" , your global
> il10n
> > > > > properties file would need to be named "petstoredemo.properties" .
> (for
> > > your
> > > > > default locale, "petstoredemo_fr.properties" for francais, etc...)
> > > > >
> > > > >  Of course I am probably completely wrong, but that's what it
> looks like
> > > so
> > > > > far. If the functionality was taken out I'm sure it was an
> oversight, or
> > > > > just not known that it was needed.
> > > > >
> > > > > What is the "use case" more or less for renaming the file? To
> follow
> > > another
> > > > > convention someone already has in place?
> > > >
> > > > I'd prefer to name it whatever I like - for instance, with Struts
> this
> > > > file is commonly named ApplicationResources.properties.  With Spring
> > > > MVC, it's commonly named messages.properties.  While neither of
> these
> > > > frameworks have a default file name, both of them allow you to
> > > > customize it to whatever you want.  I'd prefer to leave my files
> named
> > > > ApplicationResources.properties so Tapestry is easier to learn for
> > > > Struts users.
> > > >
> > > > I tried setting
> > > "org.apache.tapestry.application-specification" as an
> > > > init-parameter, but if I do this, I have to change the name of my
> > > > .application file as well.
> > > >
> > > > I tried using the following, but that didn't work either:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-tapestry/UsingCustomResourceSourceForLibs
> > > >
> > > > Here's the jist of what I'm looking for - and while Howard says it's
> > > > "fixed and fixed well" - I have a hard time believing that unless
> the
> > > > name is customizable. Here's my original desire.
> > > >
> > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-229
> > > >
> > > > My guess is using a different filename is already possible, just not
> > > documented.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Matt
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Unless Howard either says I'm completely wrong and here is how you
> do
> > > it, or
> > > > > says that he doesn't think this is a necessary feature, I don't
> see any
> > > > > reason why a JIRA post couldn't make this happen in 4.0.1.
> > > > >
> > > > >  P.S. Does this apply to .component and .page specifications as
> well?
> > > They
> > > > > all share a lot of the same infrastructure
> > > > > (application/library/page/component) for defining these
> > > > > things, just wondering which pill I'm looking at ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > j
> > > > > On 2/24/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Yeah, I saw that.  I like this feature and think that smart
> defaults
> > > > > > are cool - however, I'd like to override this and specify a
> different
> > > > > > name.  Is that possible?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Matt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2/24/06, James Carman < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> > > > > > > Oh, and I got that information from here:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/UsersGuide/localization.html#localization
> > > > > > > .namespace
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Matt Raible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
> > > > > > > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 11:46 AM
> > > > > > > To: Tapestry users
> > > > > > > Subject: Is it possible to do a global i18n bundle with
> Tapestry 4?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In Tapestry 3.0.3, I was able to specify a global properties
> file
> > > > > > > (i18n bundle) with the following:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <property
> > > name="org.apache.tapestry.global-properties"
> > > > > > > value="ApplicationResources"/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I tried doing something similar in Tapestry 4.0, but no dice.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <DEFANGED_meta
> > > > > key="org.apache.tapestry.global-properties"
> > > > > > > value="ApplicationResources"/>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is it possible to do a global i18n bundle with Tapestry 4?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Matt
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to